Dear Google, We Need To Talk…

By: Rob Miller


Home » Consumer Watchdog » Dear Google, We Need To Talk…

Dear Google,
It’s about your search results. We need to talk…

For my visitors who aren’t already aware, our site has seen a significant dip in the google search results starting on Aug. 1, 2018.

Google routinely updates their search results, sometimes as much as several times a day.

This particular update (dubbed the “Medic Update” by some) had a massive effect on the search results, specifically in the health niche.

I can understand their rationale completely.

For a long time, there were plenty of sites that were ranking for heavily searched medical-like terms, that probably should not have been.

I get it…

They have a responsibility to their customers (you, the google searcher) to present the most reliable, informative, and accurate result to your query possible.

With all that said, there’s been some strange results popping up when I run searches for keywords I used to rank for.

In many cases, I’ve been coming across things like:

  • 404 Errors
  • Blank Pages
  • Redirects to totally different sites
  • Extremely thin pages
  • Redirects to “buy cheap viagra” type sites
  • Porn images showing up
  • Etc.

These are not isolated incidents, and they are also not happening on deep pages in the results.

In fact, they’re almost ALL happening on Page 1 of the results, and for literally 100’s of searches I’ve personally conducted.

In many cases, these bad search results have almost completely taken over the page 1 results.

I’ve made a video demonstrating these very searches, check it out below:

There are a ton of search results that I did not include in the video, simply because of time restrictions.

Here are some other examples:

(note:All searches were conducted with a google incognito tab, logged out, and with a VPN. They’ve also been verified by several acquaintances in various locations throughout the US. So no, my computer is not hacked 🙂

Keyword: arthrozene reviews

This is a joint relief supplement I wrote about awhile back.

Our review is rich, and full of content regarding nearly everything there is to know about this supplement.

I’ve personally tested the product myself, and had an older gentleman named Jim test it out as part of our STEPuP program. The purpose of that was to determine if there were major differences between the effects it would have on younger adults (like my 37 year old self), and older adults (Jim is 66 years old).

We have 17 real reviews from users who have taken the product, linked to from the top of the page. content/uploads/2018/11/arthrozene

We’ve even had the content on the page medically reviewed for accuracy by Dr. Helen Okoye, our in-house medical reviewer.

When I think ‘user intent” for this particular keyword, I think only one thing…

Searchers are looking for real reviews of this particular product.

If you search the term “arthrozene reviews”, this is what you see in the Top 10 results: content/uploads/2018/11/arthrozene review search

3 of the 10 results have nothing to do with the product at all, as well 2 of the youtube videos in the carousel.

The first unrelated result (Amazon) is for a completely different product called Vital 3 Joint Solution.

The second unrelated result ( is an outdated article from 2013 that makes no mention of the product named Arthrozene.

Further down the page, in the 5th, 9th, and 10th spots, we have completely (almost) irrelevant pages showing up.

My review is pinned to the bottom of the page in the #8 spot. content/uploads/2018/11/my review of

For someone searching for real reviews of Arthrozene, this is not helping their cause.

This is somewhat related to the next search…

Keyword: Wachsen Riesig reviews

So Wachsen Riesig was a supplement I actually received a mailer on last month (October), of which I wrote a complete review on here.

Apart from the mailer (and one lone BBB complaint), there was virtually no information about this supplement available online.

I wrote the best possible review with the limited information I had.

If you look at the review, this particular company uses extremely vulgar marketing materials to push their product.

And I specifically called them out on that, along with many of their claims.

If you run a search for wachsen riesig reviews on google, this is what shows up.

wachsen riesig review search

Just like with the Arthrozene review search, the first several results have nothing to do with the search.

The first result is an Amazon listing for a completely different product (which isn’t even available, btw), and unrelated articles on and

My review is in the #5 position. content/uploads/2018/11/wachsen riesig search result

Keyword: shark tank ed pill

For the past year or so, certain unsavory marketers have been pushing a fake ad about some miracle testosterone booster, weight loss pill, even wrinkle creams being seen on the TV show “Shark Tank”.

The ads look like this:

shark tank yoojin and angela kim facebook ad

And lead to pages that look like this:

kim sisters on shark tank promoting testosterone pills

The reality is, these two “sisters” (who aren’t even sisters) did NOTdevelop some miracle testosterone booster / ed pill / weight loss supplement.

I’ve already outed them extensively in this article and this article.

Searchers looking to find out info on this particular product may search several terms.

For example, when I run a search for “shark tank ed pill”, this shows up in the #2 position:

shark tank search 2

Which, if you click on it, what you’ll see is them pushing the exact same B.S. narrative…

That there was some miracle supplement that landed a huge deal on the show.

This is simply NOT true!

If the searcher clicks on their result before mine, you could almost certainly bet that a good % of the searchers will believe what says before learning the truth.

Unfortunately, our exposé has been pinned in the #3 spot for a couple of months now. content/uploads/2018/11/s tank ed

As a matter of fact, we routinely expose similar types of scams, including:

Keyword: conor mcgregor supplements fox news

I exposed this particular scam back in June of 2017, click here to read up on it.

If you search for the term ‘conor mcgregor supplements fox news’, you’ll see another site ranking right up at the top.

conor mcgregor supplements fox news

If you click on that result (which most people do), they go into this long story about how Conor McGregor used 2 supplements called Power Testo Blast and Power Muscle Blast. content/uploads/2018/11/conor mcgregor fake supplement

It’s 100% fake…

In fact, the only supplement McGregor has ever claimed to have used publicly was BSN Syntha-6 Edge, which he briefly mentioned in a Muscle & Fitness interview.

Further down the results, we have this site perpetuating almost the exact same thing. content/uploads/2018/11/mcgregorsupps

On this particular url, they claim he is taking a hiatus from the UFC because he was taking some banned supplement named Stamimax. content/uploads/2018/11/fake conor

Again, simply not true…

Where’s our review exposing the scam?

In the #5 spot… content/uploads/2018/11/conor mcgregor

I have literally dozens of other Exposés like this, here’s just a few of them:

Denzel Washington And Dr. Phil Did NOT Develop Some ED Pill

Terry Bradshaw ED Pill

Anna And Samantha Martin Were NOT On Shark Tank

No, Morgan Freeman Did NOT Use That ED Pill

No, Zac Efron Did NOT Use Those Supplements

Keyword: evolution lean keto

This is another supplement that uses deceptive marketing to push their product.

Just like with many of the others, they’ve been pushing the “Shark Tank Weight Loss” narrative.

evolution lean keto on entertainment today

We outed the whole thing in an exposéwe published on October 15th.

Yet, if you search something like “evolution lean keto shark tank“, you’ll see nothing but sites perpetuating the scam. content/uploads/2018/11/evolution keto shark

Further down the results we have 2 Amazon listings that have nothing to do with the product, a blank page, and another url that perpetuates the scam. content/uploads/2018/11/evolution lean

So where is my exposé warning people about this particular scam?

Where else but Page 5 of the results: content/uploads/2018/11/evolution page

Keyword: over the counter viagra

When I think “user intent” for this particular keyword, I think 2 things…

  1. Someone is literally searching for a way to buy viagra over the counter (as in, in a store like CVS, Walgreens, etc.)
  2. Since buying Viagra over the counter is not legal (or recommended, even if you did find someone selling it!), the user is searching for an “herbal equivalent”.

Here are the problem results:

otc viagra search 1

When you click that result, this is what you see: content/uploads/2018/11/keyword stuffed

It’s a very heavily keyword stuffed page, that really doesn’t provide any credible info on the search at all.

What’s worse is, as you scroll a bit down the page, you’ll see a popup show up. content/uploads/2018/11/otc viagra pop

If you try to X it out, the entire page redirects and I get a malware warning from my virus protection software.

Here’s a screencast:

Further down the page, you’ll see another similar result. content/uploads/2018/11/otc viagra search

While this page doesn’t redirect, it’s clearly a keyword-stuffed page that does not provide any credible information.

See for yourself here.

Below that you have the following: content/uploads/2018/11/otc viagra search

Well, “” redirects to a totally different site selling fake Viagra.

See for yourself:

Re-purposed URLs Popping Up Everywhere

Another thing I’ve noticed was the resurgence of expired domains popping up.

For example, one product I’ve written about extensively is a supplement called Vigrx Plus.

If you search the term “vigrx plus reviews“, the very first result that shows is a domain name called

If you look at the history of this particular url on, you’ll see that it used to be an environmental assessment website. content/uploads/2018/11/mbpi in the

In that same search you’ll see a site called “” showing up in the #5 spot. content/uploads/2018/11/hawaii conference

This particular url was redirected to a site called, and had a ton of legit backlinks going to it. content/uploads/2018/11/redirected url

Those backlinks are what drive this particular url (and to the top of the search results, not the quality of their content.

Another site I’ve seen popping up all over the place is

This site used to be a full-service healthcare marketing communications consulting firm. content/uploads/2018/11/envision

Now it’s a supplement review site that shows up for terms like “vitapulse reviews content/uploads/2018/11/envision 1

andro 400 reviews content/uploads/2018/11/envision 2

and “zyrexin reviews content/uploads/2018/11/envision 3

Other sites I’ve been seeing getting away with the exact same thing include:, which was originally an “Arkansas Health Protection Guide”., which used to be a site about Artists without borders, which was originally a “national initiative for families and communities to promote and improve the health and well-being of children of all ages”. content/uploads/2018/11/bright, which was a blog about elastic CSS framework of all things., which was originally the National Vitiligo Foundations website.

And the list goes on and on…

This technique of buying expired domains and re-purposing them is nothing new. It’s been going on for as long as I can remember, I’m just very surprised to see this particular tactic working in 2018.


I could go on and on and on about this…

I’m not exactly sure why google is ranking these types of sites, especially the ones in the video.

Are they relying too much on links?

My suspicion is yes, they are.

For the longest time, whenever experienced a traffic drop like this in the past, there was always one way around it: Write better content and make a better site.

We’ve always strived to “do our best” and “do it the right way”, and make it a point to write informative, well-researched, and fun articles and reviews.

However, with results like these showing up, I’m really not sure I could write anything better than I already have.

It’s very disheartening to see results like these popping up, especially considering all the near-daily positive feedback in the form of emails and comments we get thanking us for “saving them” from a potentially dangerous or financially draining product.

Here’s just a few of the more recent ones: content/uploads/2018/11/thank you email content/uploads/2018/11/thank you email content/uploads/2018/11/thank you email content/uploads/2018/11/thank you email

We’ve written numerous articles informing those who have been sucked in by a free trial, debunking potentially dangerous myths about ‘permanent enlargement pills‘, and countless others.

Despite the setbacks, I’ll continue to do my very best at helping you find the best supplements possible.

I always try to find a way to turn a black cloud into a silver lining, and this time is no different.

If you have any questions, you can always reach out to me here.

User Reviews

Have you used this supplement?

There Are No User Reviews

Ask A Question

User Questions and Answers

No Questions Have Been Answered For This Article.

Author: Rob Miller

Supplement Critique

Rob Miller founded over 7 years ago, and has been the chief editor ever since. He has a diploma in Advanced Dietary Supplements Advisor, and worked at GNC for 3 years. He KNOWS supplements, both inside and out. Rob currently resides in Jupiter, FL, with his wife of 4 years.  Learn more about him in his Bio here. Follow him on Twitter , Facebook, LinkedIn, or find him on Google +.

18 comments on “Dear Google, We Need To Talk…”

Leave A New Comment

  1. Hi Rob,
    Thanks for the heads up. Google is definitely relying on links and considering it as the number one ranking factor.

    You know what?

    Their algo is super stupid. A number of sites in my niche are buying links from sites that have ZERO traffic but a lot of referring domains.

    And of course, even my 10 years old nephew will understand those are PBN by seeing the articles that are dumped to provide links. Irrelevant articles throughout the home page.

    Google just need to implement one simple logic.

    Devalue the backlinks that have zero traffic, but a good number of referring domains. I don’t know if their shitty algo can detect if the domain was expired or not.

    But checking the traffic against the RD is well enough for the time being as almost all the PBN follows the same pattern.
    1. “Devalue the backlinks that have zero traffic, but a good number of referring domains."

      Hmmmm I’m not entirely sure that would work. For example, let’s say I published a research paper in College 10 years ago.

      It has 200 citations from other .edu domains, but gets next to no traffic.

      The url isn’t necessarily a “bad” one because it doesn’t get any traffic, it’s just old.

      Obviously it’s way more complex than that, I can just see some major issues if they tried to do that. But I agree with you on the PBN’s, that just should not be happening in 2018.

      I’ve never relied on links for my site to grow, we’ve simply relied on creating good content. But it is (and always has been) depressing to see sites with inferior content outranking mine, simply because they are using PBN’s.

  2. We’ve personally noticed a 90% drop in traffic in the past couple months. The articles that outrank us now are a joke.

    Many long standing niche sites that we’ve frequented for their expertise have been absolutely demolished by Googles new Drunk Brain algorithm. What a gross oversight by Google engineers.

    It’s really embarrassing actually.

    We have reviewed the quality guidelines thoroughly and made a few changes. Added an about page, de-anonymized the content by adding visible authors, etc. But I’m not sold that anything will work.

    Dr Axe lost most of his traffic and few health sites have more link authority and more high quality content than his.

    Perhaps outbound links are becoming more critical, the studies you link to, etc. But, maybe the manual reviewers have ultimate say in your page quality and one person from India not liking your site after spending 5 minutes on it could very well be a death sentence for your business. Unreal.

    1. “But, maybe the manual reviewers have ultimate say in your page quality and one person from India not liking your site after spending 5 minutes on it could very well be a death sentence for your business."

      That’s actually the one thing I disagree with you on. I really don’t think the page quality raters have a direct impact on specific sites like that.

      But I guess anythings possible!
  3. Great post and wow did you hit the nail on the head! Perhaps it’s best if we all take our searches to another search engine and stop drowning in the Google madness!

    1. Probably unlikely, considering their market cap on the search market. However, I have noticed a slight (albeit very slight) increase in referrers from Bing and Yahoo the last month. I’ve found myself popping on over to them a few times the last month as well for some searches I just wasn’t getting any good results for on google.

      Time will tell!
  4. You are right about the random results, but from what I see, Google is simply doing some major A/B testing.
    Also, many of these repurposed sites have been hit pretty hard, like:

    They are not completely down, but their traffic has declined.

    So if anything, these recent updates have been targeting exactly that.
    1. Sorry man, had to remove that link. But I do know what you’re saying about them, I have seen that trend.

      What baffles me is that they are present at all. I mean, it’s a blatant BH tactic.

      As for the A/B testing, personally speaking I’ve always thought they’ve done this, albeit on a much lesser scale than they are now. For example, in the past (like 1 – 2 years ago) I’ve had several very comprehensive articles bounce between page 1 and page 4 – 5 for a couple of months.

      Over time, it would make its way to page 1 and stay there.

      We know that they use metrics like time on site and bounce rate to determine how “good” the content is. Many of these articles I’m talking about have a time on page of somewhere in the range of 6 min., which is an eternity in my niche.

      It seems to me that they cranked down that metric, and turned up the knob on brands and links. I say that because there is no way that some of the articles / reviews taking our place have anywhere near a 5 – 6 min. time on page.

      I mean, we’re talking 200 – 300 word blurbs about products in some cases.
      I know word count doesn’t mean s#$t in the grand scheme of things if it answers the query, but in most cases these articles simply do not answer the query.

      I know this because I’ve personally run 100’s of searches in unrelated niches, and can objectively say a good chunk of them do not.

      I would give examples, but I’m actually thinking about pushing out another video / blog post demonstrating this.
  5. What a fantastic piece of research in to how Google is seriously still doing it all wrong. I have not sites in this specific niche – but still see some of the same issues you have noted – primarily the issue with expired domains which irritates the hell out of me when shit sites with no URL relevancy outrank me out of nowhere.

    For those of us trying to do things ethically – it is draining. Hopefully someone at Google will actually see this!

    Hang in there! And great site by the way — keep up the good work!

    1. “Primarily the issue with expired domains which irritates the hell out of me when shit sites with no URL relevancy outrank me out of nowhere."

      Exactly this, Jill!

      This has been irritating me to no end for well over a year at this point. I mean, I used to see sites like this ranking close to a decade ago.

      But in 2018? Should not be happening at all.

      Thanks for your comment!

  6. You are awesome, thank you so much for putting this together. As a fellow webmaster in the health space, we’ve been going through the exact same thing.

    It seems like black hat is winning the SEO game at the moment.
    1. I think you’re right. I’ve certainly been seeing the “black hat” type sites rise up in the results, much more so than before the August update.

  7. I run a protein/bodybuilding supplement review type blog in the UK.

    Nothing as detailed and impressive as this, but I too have seen garbage in the SERPs. I wish you well with your mission.

    Feel free to drop me an email if you want to chat, I’ve recovered slightly since “medic”
    1. Hey Mike,
      Yeah it’s been a very frustrating couple of months, that’s for sure. In fact, I was just noticing the other day (or maybe a week ago?) how far reaching it’s become.

      I was trying to search for something completely non-medical / health related, and the results were just….there’s just no other way to put it but terrible.
      I literally could not find the answer to my query.

      No matter how many times I tried to rephrase the search, it kept spitting back very vague results that did not answer my question at all.

      The stranger thing is, it doesn’t do this all the time. In fact, the vast majority of the time the answer is very accurate / I find what I need pretty quickly.

      But I’d say about 10 – 15% of the searches are just all over the map.

      And in my niche (supplements), it’s way worse.
      Very weird…

  8. Rob – first of all, great piece, and I 100% think you’re right about the poor and spammy results.

    As you know, you’re not the only supplement / health site hit by this update, actually seems that the only winners are a few of the big boys, like Mayo Clinic, Healthline, WebMD.

    Even DoctorOz and Dr Axe got hit hard! As well as DietDoctor – which initially won in August.

    Since I’m a newbie to your site but study SEO – just one or two things I initially notices. A big part of Google’s quality guidelines is the trustworthiness of a site.

    I have to say, when initially landing on – it doesn’t scream “high quality”, at least the design and feel. It shouldn’t matter, but one of the questions in the quality rater’s guideline is “would you trust this site with your credit card” and I can’t say I would, based on the 2-second first impression. Your design actually is similar to Healthline, but a few small design nuances that probably make the difference.

    A second thing, is it’s written in a very direct response, internet-markety style, which is great for marketing, but may not be the way to go in this update, and it’s probably best to follow a writing model from the leaders like MayoClinic.

    I don’t fully believe what others are saying, that it’s all E-A-T – but this is probably a portion of it, and more of a weight in this space.

    Just a few thoughts, hopefully it helps somewhat!
    1. Hey Joe,
      Thanks for that, we always appreciate the feedback! I definitely agree with you on the look / feel of the site.

      It’s certainly not the prettiest site out there, but we’ve always tried to put the quality of our main content above everything else. As for the writing style, yeah that’s another thing we’ve been tinkering with.

      One particular thing I’ve noticed happening a lot in our niche is that sites like,,, and other research-based groups have been showing up more often.

      Like I mentioned in the post, I can understand Googles rationale behind this.

      The problem is, the average searcher can’t decipher what these sites are talking about. It’s written in a very incomprehensible way that, to the layman, often leaves more questions than answers.

      We try to bridge that gap by translating it in a way that makes it easy to understand, and fun to read.

      Perhaps you’re right though.

      We may need to re-assess how the information is presented so that it better aligns with their goals.
  9. Thank you for taking the time to put this together. It’s disheartening to see this type of spam is still so prevalent.

    With any luck, your article will draw some attention to the issue!

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *